Reichert Verlag

This book undertakes a comparative analysis of the conflict of voices in the poetry of the South African poet Dennis Brutus (b. 1924), and the Palestinian poet Mahmūd Darwīsh (b. 1942), with the purpose of demonstrating that the conflict of voices in their poetry develops across four stages during the period extending from the mid-sixties to the mid-nineties. Although the study reveals that during each stage, the two poets’ poetry shows similarities in broader terms, the analysis demonstrates that within each stage, each of the two poets develops techniques that are peculiarly his own. The study also maintains a link between the development of the conflict of voices in the poetry and the larger conditions influencing the changes occurring on the social and political levels in both South Africa and Palestine.
The study falls into five chapters, an introduction and a conclusion. The first part of Chapter One is both a critique of the basic tenets of the theories of impersonality and the death of the author, and an attempt to show how the concept of voice developed from the writings of the major exponents of those theories. The second part of the chapter outlines the critical framework the study is conducted within, which is an eclectic framework deriving from the work of mainly North American critics who have developed the concept of voice, subjectivity and impersonality in their writings. Each of the following four chapters is concerned with tracing the development of the conflict of voices in a distinct stage. Chapter Two deals with the ‘pre-conflict’ stage, and demonstrates how the poetry here shows a wavering between pure lyricism and extreme impersonality. Chapter Three represents the stage of eruption of the conflict of voices and the appearance of polyphonic structures. Chapter Four deals with the stage of withdrawal of both the conflict and lyricism, and the predominance of impersonal structures. The fifth chapter deals with the fourth stage of development. It represents a partial resolution of the conflict which had shaped the two pots’ poetry in the preceding three stages by highlighting a synthesis of the formerly conflicting voices in a modified type of lyricism.
The study is the first attempt to deal with the poetry if Dennis Brutus and Mahmūd Darwīsh in a comparative framework, and is also the first lengthy study of the aspect of voice in the poetry of either poet. While the study hopes to be considered a contribution to the scholarship of each poet, it also hopes to have made it possible for other comparative studies approaching Arabic and sub-Saharan African literatures to emerge.

Literatures in Context is a peer-reviewed book series devoted to Near Eastern and North African literatures. The editors want the title of the series to be understood programmatically. They presuppose a concept of world literature that includes Near Eastern and North African literatures. What is more, they assume that literatures are in many ways marked by intertextuality, that they constitute readings of extremely diverse earlier texts, and that they are posited within a field of tensions, much broader than their respective national language. For the earlier eras of Near Eastern and North African literatures, this field of tensions geographically covers the regions of the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean and Asia Minor. In modern times, it has become a space of interaction that has long since included “global” Western literatures (and realities). This does not imply that the modern Near Eastern and North African literatures have severed themselves from their predecessors. Instead it is precisely the tension between different sets of references in modern Near Eastern and North African literatures, or their “local historical context”, which is a great part of their attraction, that remains a crucial field of research for the modern scholar.